Pundi AI Theft Case: Balancing Asset Security and Information Transparency

Reflections on the Pundi AI Theft Incident: The Trade-off Between User Asset Protection and Information Transparency

On July 12, Pundi AI suffered a hacker attack, resulting in the abnormal issuance of 1 million tokens. The team quickly took action to freeze assets and initiate tracking. Ultimately, nearly 90% of the stolen funds were successfully recovered, and over one million dollars were advanced to complete full user compensation. However, Pundi AI was notified by several exchanges in South Korea to delist due to "untimely information disclosure."

Forced to leave after 5 years in Korea, is Pundi AI's priority to protect user assets a "wrong decision"?

To help readers understand the context of the events, here is a review of the key timeline:

  • March 2: Function X announced a rebranding to PUNDIAI and a token swap to PUNDI, at which point the hacker had already infiltrated.

  • July 12: Hackers launched an attack, issuing an abnormal increase of 1 million tokens; transfers were frozen on that day and tracking was initiated; that evening the CEO publicly informed the community about vulnerabilities in the contract.

  • July 14: Disclose the investigation results and solutions of the attack incident to the exchange, and communicate with DAXA.

  • July 28: Several South Korean exchanges announced that they will delist PundiAI on August 28.

  • July 31: Official statement retrieves over 80% of assets, full user compensation completed within 11 days.

During the incident response process, Pundi AI faced a dilemma: should they prioritize ensuring user fund safety without alerting the hackers, or maintain transparency by disclosing information promptly, potentially allowing the hackers to accelerate fund transfers? Pundi AI chose the former, but also paid a price due to the "flaw" in transparency.

Forced to leave after 5 years in Korea, is Pundi AI's priority to protect user assets a "wrong decision"?

Co-founder Danny Lim stated that being delisted has instead unsealed the "seal" for project development, allowing for more flexible use of token economics to reward the community. Pundi AI will buy back tokens and airdrop them to users, thanking them for their support during difficult times.

Hackers exploited a vulnerability in the token migration contract to gain admin privileges ahead of deploying a new contract. This technique is very precise and requires careful timing of transactions. Danny warns all project teams planning token migrations or contract upgrades to be aware of the potential risks of "front-running attacks."

For the South Korean market, Danny pointed out that the timeliness and transparency of information are crucial. This incident has served as a wake-up call for all projects that have launched or are planning to launch in South Korea. Although the delisting has impacted Pundi AI's reputation, community users still maintain their trust, and the coin price remains relatively stable.

Forced to leave after 5 years in Korea, is Pundi AI's priority to protect user assets a "wrong decision"?

In the future, Pundi AI will increase its investment in decentralized exchanges, promote the new AI data product Data Pump, and implement token buyback and airdrop plans. Data Pump is a "Launchpad for AI datasets" aimed at tokenizing data, allowing users to package content data into NFTs and generate corresponding tokens for trading.

Danny believes that the bottleneck in the development of Web3 AI lies in the lack of truly useful applications that can change lives. The real value of blockchain in the AI field is to protect users' data sovereignty and privacy. He predicts that the real boom in the Web3 AI sector may have to wait for traditional AI giants to actively embrace blockchain technology and provide users with data protection features.

Forced to leave after 5 years in Korea, is Pundi AI's priority to protect user assets a "wrong decision"?

PUNDIAI-2.57%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
StablecoinGuardianvip
· 4h ago
The advance payment is quite reliable.
View OriginalReply0
GasWhisperervip
· 14h ago
mempool patterns never lie... hack was brewing since march, shoulda seen those anomalies tbh
Reply0
GasWranglervip
· 08-10 03:38
technically speaking, their security architecture was sub-optimal from day 1... any proper mempool analysis would've caught this
Reply0
CommunityJanitorvip
· 08-10 03:38
How can we defend against this if it's still being hacked?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeTearsvip
· 08-10 03:37
The hacker is too arrogant, and the project party is having a hard time.
View OriginalReply0
FlatlineTradervip
· 08-10 03:37
Trapped again, where is the brain of the Korean exchange?
View OriginalReply0
JustHereForMemesvip
· 08-10 03:30
Mystery box reveals a series of Hacker attacks LOL
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate app
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)