In the field of Crypto Assets, the term "Decentralization" is often misused. However, the emergence of Bubblemaps makes it difficult for the project party to hide their true operations.

This tool can provide insight into the behavior of the project party, revealing facts that contradict their claims. For example, some projects that claim to have fair token distribution may actually have numerous issues: the lock-up period for tokens held by venture capital firms is too short, the team acquires a large number of tokens through hidden channels, or the so-called community funds are transferred to centralized exchanges for sale. Once these behaviors are discovered, they often lead to a collapse in investor confidence.

For different types of projects, the existence of Bubblemaps has provoked completely different reactions. Truly honest teams will proactively disclose the analytical results of Bubblemaps to attract long-term investors. In contrast, some problematic projects will try to prevent the community from discussing the analysis of Bubblemaps to cover up possible issues.

With the popularity of Bubblemaps, savvy investors have regarded it as an essential due diligence tool. When evaluating new projects, they focus on key indicators such as the concentration of token holdings, the actual unlocking time of team tokens, and the distribution of voting rights for governance proposals.

In the world of Web3, actions speak far louder than hollow promises in proving the value of a project. Projects that dare to use Bubblemaps to demonstrate their transparency are more deserving of investors' trust and support. The emergence of such tools undoubtedly drives the entire industry towards higher standards of transparency and integrity.